Hon'ble Editors, as it's now most indelibly recorded that we're all descendants of the same Universal ancestry, I'd expect
there's some rhetoric that could be added to the awareness of our anticipative understanding. The evolution of our educative
world may be seen as combining many different forms or styles of rhetoric to the anticipative awareness of our knowledgeable
understanding by allowing for an ever-changing recording of these events to exist in a world of adjacent infinity. The responsibility
of these ever-changing events or projective lexicographic recordings may be viewed as resting upon the logic that we're all
traveling in a Universe of ethereal beauty, and reasoning which's the true measure of our worthiness and most crestive affinite
being. Thus allowing for the true measurement of our worthiness or worthily creative faults in accordance to the value of
another person's wealth to surely be the first step in the slice of an indebted garden's forbidden fruit. The second possibility's
to be found in the fabrication of our worldliness towards an over-zealous attachment to pre-conditioned or judgmental morals.
1. Grammar: When attempting to express an idea or logical expression of assurance it may be said that it 'm-e-e-n'(s) something.
(1a.) Spelling: 'M-E-E-N' an assumption of knowledge or act of communicating or to be knowledgeably understood. . .
2. Grammar: An expression of disdain or dislike for something might be said that it’s being "m-e-a-n". . .
(2a.) Spelling: 'M-E-A-N' ill-tempered; unrefined or nasty (Anonyms: caring, loving, cheerful, pleasant, happy, etc.). . .
Question: So, how's the opportunity for a strengthening of our cognitive skills or associative (i.e. metaphysical telamentation)
thinking allowed to become so diminished by spelling the word 'm-e-e-n' ("m-e-a-n") only one way?