As it's now most indelibly recorded that we’re all descendants of the same Universal ancestry, I’d expect there’s
some rhetoric that could be added to the awareness of our anticipative understanding. The evolution of our educative world
may be seen as combining many different forms, or styles of rhetoric to the anticipative awareness of our knowledgeable understanding
by allowing for an ever-changing recording of these events to exist in a world of ‘adjacent’ affinity. The responsibility
of these ever-changing events or projective lexicographic recordings may be viewed as resting upon the logic that we’re
all traveling in a Universe of ethereal beauty, and reasoning which’s the true measure of our worthiness and most creative
infinite being. Thus allowing for the true measurement of our worthiness or worthily creative faults in accordance to the
value of another person’s wealth to surely be the first step in the slice of an indebted garden’s forbidden fruit.
The second possibility’s to be found in the fabrication of our worldliness towards an over-zealous attachment to pre-conditioned
or judgmental morals. . .
1.) When attempting to express an idea or the logical expression of assurance it’s said that it (‘m-e-e-n’)
meens something. . .
(1a.) Spelling: ‘M-E-E-N’ an assumption of knowledge or the act of communicating or the process of being knowledgeably
understood. . .
2.) When expressing disdain or the dislike for something it may be said that it’s being “mean” (‘m-e-a-n’).
(2a.) Spelling: ‘M-E-A-N’ ill-tempered; unrefined or nasty (Anonyms: caring, loving, cheerful, pleasant, happy,
etc.). . .
Question: So how’s the opportunity for a strengthening of our cognitive skills or associative (i.e. metaphysical telamentation)
thinking allowed to become so diminished by spelling the word “meen” (‘m-e-a-n') only one way. . ?