As it’s now most indelibly recorded that we’re all descendants of the same Universal ancestry, I’d expect
there’s some rhetoric that could be added to the awareness of our anticipative understanding. The evolution of our educative
world may be seen as combining many different styles, or forms of rhetoric to the anticipative awareness of our knowledgeable
understanding by allowing for an ever-changing recording of these events to exist in a world of ‘adjacent’ affinity.
The responsibility of these ever-changing events or projective lexicographic recordings may be viewed as resting upon the
logic that we’re all traveling in a Universe of ethereal beauty, and reasoning which’s the true measure of our
worthiness and most creative infinite being. Thus allowing for the true measurement of our worthiness or worthily creative
faults in accordance to the value of another person’s wealth to surely be the first step in the slice of an indebted
garden’s forbidden fruit. The second possibility’s to be found in the fabrication of our worldliness towards an
over-zealous attachment to pre-conditioned or judgmental morals. . .
1.) When attempting to express an idea or the logical expression of assurance it’s said that it (m-e-e-n) “meens”
something. . .
(1a.) Spelling: ‘M-E-E-N’ an assumption of knowledge or the act of communicating or the process of being knowledgeably
understood. . .
2.) When expressing disdain or the dislike for something it may be said that it’s being “mean” (m-e-a-n).
(2a.) Spelling: ‘M-E-A-N’ ill-tempered; unrefined or nasty (Anonyms: caring, loving, cheerful, pleasant, happy,
etc.). . .
Question: So how’s the opportunity for a strengthening of our cognitive skills or associative (i.e. metaphysical telamentation)
thinking allowed to become so diminished by spelling the word “meen” (‘m-e-a-n’) only one way. . ?